The Best Immersion Blender

After putting in more than 20 hours researching immersion blenders, considering 54 models, interviewing two soup-making pros, and then testing nine of the blenders over nearly three years (including pureeing gallons of soup, smoothies, salsa, mayonnaise, and even ice), we’re confident that you can’t buy a better immersion blender than the Breville Control Grip. It produces smoother textures than almost any other model we tried. Smart design features, such as a grippy handle, no-suction gasket, and a wider range of speeds, make it far easier to use than the competition.

Last Updated: December 11, 2015
Recently, All Clad, OXO and Vremi were selected by seriouseats.com as their top three immersion blenders after three months of testing. While these models weren't available during our original testing, we're eager to follow up on Serious Eats' testing with our own. Though they did confirm our also great pick, the Cuisinart CSB-75, as "a surprisingly solid budget option...this entry-level model did remarkably well in almost every trial—even besting the big guns in one of several whipped-cream tests."
Expand Most Recent Updates
November 25, 2015: Cuisinart added a new, more powerful blender, the CSB-100, to its line of immersion blenders. We're currently looking for trusted reviews of this new model and plan on testing it during our next update.

Breville BSB510XL Control Grip Immersion Blender
Smoother and faster pureeing (as well as a smarter design) make this immersion blender worth its steep price.

In addition to making smoother textures and being the overall easiest to use, we found the Breville excelled at tougher tasks that others just couldn’t handle. It was one of the only blenders to make super-smooth peanut butter and to crush ice. Its 42-ounce blending jar was also the only one big enough to fit the ingredients for two smoothies. It’s one of the pricier hand blenders out there, but we think the Breville Control Grip is far less likely to languish in a junk drawer or at the back of a cupboard than other, inconvenient offerings.

Also Great
KitchenAid KHB2351CU 3-Speed Hand Blender
This doesn’t blend as smoothly as our main pick, but it’s comfortable to use and makes decent-if-chunky soups and smoothies.

If $100 is just too steep or the Breville sells out, we’d opt for the KitchenAid 3-Speed Hand Blender. This came in second overall. It’s not as good at processing fibrous ingredients, such as cooked root veggies or raw kale, but it makes reasonably smooth textures and the handle is comfortable.

Also Great

*At the time of publishing, the price was $30.

Cuisinart CSB-75BC Smart Stick Immersion Blender
Get this over our main pick only if you don't think you'll use it that often. It’s less powerful and feels cheaper overall, but it outperforms its $35 price.

When it comes to blenders (upright and immersion), we’ve found that you really do get what you pay for. The Cuisinart CSB-75BC Smart Stick Immersion Blender makes thicker textures than the Breville, its handle feels much cheaper, and overall it has a flimsier build. But for not quite $35, it’s surprisingly powerful—especially compared with other models in this price category. We think this is a good buy if you plan on using an immersion blender only a couple of times a month, or if you don’t mind using a lower-quality machine. This doesn’t come with any attachments, such as a chopper or whisk, so it’s really only good for pureeing soups, smoothies, or sauces.

Table of contents

Why you should trust us

Over the past two years, I’ve spent close to 200 hours researching and testing, and writing about kitchen gadgets that whirl, cut, and chop, for The Sweethome. That includes guides about food processors, blenders, and our original immersion blender review. Before that, I spent a few years skulking (as a cookbook editor) around the test kitchens at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, where I once got an in-depth tutorial from Martha’s onetime private chef, Pierre Schaedelin, on how to make the perfect strained French puree (which I’m way too lazy to do myself!).

For this guide, I spoke with Rudy Speckamp, a former restaurateur who’s logged countless hours using immersion blenders as an instructor at the Culinary Institute of America, as well as Volker Frick, who worked with immersion blenders for 20 years as the executive chef at the soup manufacturer Kettle Cuisine. To decide which models to bring in, I read reviews in Cook’s Illustrated and Consumer Reports, and looked closely at user ratings on sites such as Amazon and Macy’s.

Who should get this

If you’re pureeing a soup, you could use a blender or a food processor, but an immersion blender just makes it one pot cookery.
It’s worth investing in an immersion blender if you make pureed soups. “If you’re pureeing a soup, you could use a blender or a food processor, but an immersion blender just makes it one pot cookery,” the Culinary Institute’s Speckamp told us, since it’s easy to puree soup directly in the stockpot. Immersion blenders also work well for small batches of mayonnaise, single or double batches of smoothies, pesto, or even baby food.

An immersion blender won’t work for heavier tasks or make the smoothest texture. A food processor, with its various blades and disks, works best for most chopping, dicing, or shredding, and a full-size blender makes much smoother purees and smoothies. (If you want more details on the differences between blenders, processors, and mixers, we’ve covered the subject in some depth.)

We recommend upgrading from an old immersion blender only if your current model takes a long time to blend smooth textures or if you want more attachments, such as a mini chopper or whisk.

How we picked and tested

An immersion blender’s motor needs to have enough torque to create a vigorous vortex so that food circulates in the mixing vessel and passes through the rotary blade multiple times.  “If there’s a lot of movement, that’s good,” said Volker Frick, the former executive chef at Kettle Cuisine. “How deep does [the vortex] go? And how quickly does it spit it back up?” An effective vortex will create a smooth puree, while a subpar one will leave stringy or chunky bits in soup or smoothies.

Because these machines are designed to be used one-handed (you’ll likely hold a pot or mixing cup with your other hand), the best ones are comfortable to hold. That means the buttons should be easy to press, the handle should feel good, and the machine should be light enough to hold comfortably for up to a minute. (Most non-commercial immersion blenders shouldn’t be used for longer than a minute at a time or they’ll overheat.)

Nicer consumer immersion blenders have removable blending wands. This allows you to put the wand in the dishwasher for easy cleanup and to connect different attachments (such as a food chopper or whisk). Higher-end models (such as those by Bamix) and those made for commercial use tend to have wands that don’t come off. In part, the fixed wand may be why these pro-grade blenders tend to be more durable than consumer ones; there are simply less pieces that can break. (I couldn’t find an official appliance engineer to confirm this, but my brother-in-law, a process engineer, agreed with this assessment.) That said, in our testing we found fixed wands cumbersome to wash, and we haven’t had any durability problems with the detachable wand of our main pick in nearly three years of testing.

In part, we like the Breville Control Grip for its easy-to-remove blending wand. Christine Cyr Clisset

In part, we like the Breville Control Grip for its easy-to-remove blending wand. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

A stainless steel wand and cage housing the blade offers greater durability than plastic components. Cheap plastic components can warp in a batch of hot soup (or if they touch the hot side of a pot). We read at least one Amazon review and a mention in the comments of this Kitchn piece complaining about just this problem with cheaper, all-plastic models.

Although many higher-end immersion blenders come with multiple speeds, we found that you really only need two of them—low and high. America’s Test Kitchen/Cook’s also found this to be true in their reviews.

As for attachments, many models come with a food chopper and whisk. Both Volker Frick and Rudy Speckamp agreed that these attachments are really just gravy, since the main task is to blend. In our own testing, we’ve found the chopper attachment, in particular, useful for grinding small batches of bread crumbs, making a quick vinaigrette, or even filling for ravioli (but not always great for chopping things like onions, which tend to get pulverized).

Some brands make models with taller wands, advertising these as better for blending in deep pots. Rudy Speckamp agreed: “It’s important, especially for quantity cooking, because you want it to go to the bottom of the pot for pureeing. If the shaft only goes to the middle of the pot, I don’t think it’s as successful.” Our top pick happens to have the tallest blending wand of the models we tested.

The Breville’s blending wand, left, was longer than those of the three other immersion blenders we tested this year, or the six we tested in 2013 (not pictured). Christine Cyr Clisset

The Breville’s blending wand, left, was longer than those of the three other immersion blenders we tested this year, or the six we tested in 2013 (not pictured). Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

A couple of other nice features to look for: a guard for the rotary blade and a wall-mounted holder for the blender. Both of these features will help keep your immersion blender from dangerously lurking in a drawer, waiting to slice you.

There are a variety of cordless immersion blenders on the market. Like many cordless tools, these tend not to be as powerful as their corded counterparts. We didn’t find any that topped editorial or user reviews.

Nearly every major brand that makes small kitchen appliances makes an immersion blender, but there’s not much consensus—at least in editorial reviews—about who makes the best. America’s Test Kitchen/Cook’s, Consumer Reports, and Good Housekeeping didn’t test the same models, and we didn’t find any agreement in the smaller reviews we read, so it was difficult to compare results. Because of this, we looked at Amazon reviews more closely than we would usually.

For our 2013 review, we tested (from left) the Bamix Mono Hand Blender, Waring Quik Stik, Breville Control Grip, Cuisinart Smart Stick 2-Speed CSB-75, Cuisinart Smart Stick 2-Speed CSB-77, KitchenAid 3-Speed Hand Blender, and KitchenAid 5-Speed Hand Blender. Christine Cyr Clisset

For our 2013 review, we tested (from left) the Bamix Mono Hand Blender, Waring Quik Stik, Breville Control Grip, Cuisinart Smart Stick 2-Speed CSB-75, Cuisinart Smart Stick 2-Speed CSB-77, KitchenAid 3-Speed Hand Blender, and KitchenAid 5-Speed Hand Blender. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

For our original 2013 review, we brought in seven models, ranging from $33 to $150, for testing. For this update, we looked for new editorial reviews and again looked at user reviews, settling on two new models—the Dualit Immersion Blender and the Panasonic MX-SS1—to pit against our former winner, the Breville Control Grip, and budget pick, the Cuisinart Smart Stick 2-Speed CSB-75.

For our 2015 update we tested (from left) the Cuisinart and Breville (our original winners) against the the Panasonic MX-SS1 and Dualit Immersion Blender. Christine Cyr Clisset

For our 2015 update we tested (from left) the Cuisinart and Breville (our original winners) against the the Panasonic MX-SS1 and Dualit Immersion Blender. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

With each immersion blender, we pureed kale-and-berry smoothies in the blending cups and batches of fibrous chickpea and kale soup directly in a pot, straining both recipes through a fine-mesh sieve to see how much pulp was left over. We made small batches of mayonnaise to judge how easy it was to use the immersion blender with one hand and pour oil with the other (and whether the casings around the blades would suction to the bottom of the blending cups). We ground peanuts into butter to see how well the blenders processed tough bits and dealt with sticky ingredients. In the chopper attachment (if the blender came with one), we diced garlic and a single onion to judge whether the machines could make an even chop, without pulverizing the alliums.

Our pick

Breville BSB510XL Control Grip Immersion Blender
Smoother and faster pureeing (as well as a smarter design) make this immersion blender worth its steep price.

Though it’s on the pricier side (it’s $100), we think that because the Breville Control Grip Immersion Blender is so much easier and pleasant to use than other hand blenders, it’s more likely to get regular play in the kitchen. It processes smoother textures than most of the blenders we tried and does so faster. Rubber grips on the handle and a control button make it more comfortable to hold. It’s one of the only models we tried that didn’t suction to the bottom of a pot or mixing cup. The Breville’s 1,250-milliliter (42-ounce) cup holds more than twice as much as the next best blender—enough for two smoothies. Its wider range of speeds and well thought out attachments also elevate it above the competition.

It processes smoother textures than most of the blenders we tried and does so faster.

The Breville was better at pureeing smoothies and soups than all but one of our testing models (the Dualit). In our original 2013 tests, it easily made the smoothest pureed soup and was the only blender that could grind peanuts into a smooth peanut butter. When we strained the pureed carrot-tomato-ginger soup in 2013, the Breville was the only one that left almost zero food waste in the sieve. This year’s test played out differently, as we used a more fibrous kale and chickpea soup recipe, and none of the immersion blenders really made a smooth textured puree. But the Breville was still one of the quickest to blend the soup, achieving a good texture in 1 minute, 26 seconds, basically tying with the Panasonic at 1 minute, 29 seconds. (That said, we found that the Panasonic ended up dying in another test when we ran it between 1 minute, 30 seconds and 2 minutes.) By comparison, the Dualit took 1 minutes, 55 seconds, and the Cuisinart took 2 minutes, 25 seconds to make a comparably smooth texture.

Although the Breville didn’t make a much smoother textured soup than the other models we tested this year, it did so faster and was also easier to use.

None of the blenders we tested in 2013 or this year excelled at green smoothies. They all left confetti bits of kale and berry seeds behind. But the Breville did manage to make slightly smoother textures than most, about on par with the Dualit. But the Dualit is also a much more powerful blender (400 watts vs the Breville’s 280 watts). When we strained the smoothies, the Breville and Dualit mixtures left about the same amount of pulp in the sieve.

None of the immersion blenders we tested made absolutely smooth green smoothies, but we could strain the most from the Breville (left) and Dualit (center) mixtures. The Panasonic (right) left a little more pulp in the sieve. Christine Cyr Clisset

None of the immersion blenders we tested made absolutely smooth green smoothies, but we could strain the most from the Breville (left) and Dualit (center) mixtures. The Panasonic (right) left a little more pulp in the sieve. Photos by: Christine Cyr Clisset

The Breville was the most comfortable to use, so it was easier to process things that took a few minutes.
In addition to blending well, the Breville was the most comfortable to use, so it was easier to process things that took a few minutes (like a pot of soup or mayo). The Breville’s pulse button and parts of the handle are covered in rubber, so they’re really grippy. The Dualit’s handle, by comparison, is made of slick, chrome-colored plastic that got really slippery with oil. The Dualit’s handle also noticeably vibrates, which I found unpleasant in the palm, and was too big for my hand. Compared with both the Panasonic and the Cuisinart, the Breville seemed to require less torque when moving around a pot of soup (thus, saving strain on the wrist). Its buttons were also among the easiest to push (only the Bamix’s were better).

We found the thinner shape and rubber grips on the Breville’s handle (left) much easier to hold than the Dualit’s wider, slick plastic one. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

Compared with both the Panasonic and the Cuisinart, the Breville seemed to require less torque when moving around a pot of soup (thus, saving strain on the wrist).
Making mayonnaise wasn’t all that easy with any of the blenders (we prefer a mini chopper for this task), but it wasn’t as much of a pain with the Breville, thanks to a gasket at the base of the metal cage. The gasket kept the blender from suctioning to the bottom of the mixing cup, and did the same when blending soup. All of the other immersion blenders we tested, except the Dualit, suctioned to the bottom of the blending cup or a soup pot so that we had to forcefully lift the blenders off the bottom. It wasn’t dangerous, but you can avoid the annoyance entirely with the Breville.

A gasket at the base of the Breville’s blending wand (bottom) helps keep the blender from suctioning to pots and its blending cup. The Dualit’s plastic base (left) worked about as well, but the all-metal Cuisinart (top) suctioned when making mayonnaise. Christine Cyr Clisset

A gasket at the base of the Breville’s blending wand (bottom) helps keep the blender from suctioning to pots and its blending cup. The Dualit’s plastic base (left) worked about as well, but the all-metal Cuisinart (top) suctioned when making mayonnaise. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

It was the only one in this past round of testing that comfortably fit the ingredients for two smoothies.
Over the past two years of long-term testing, we haven’t used the Breville’s mixing cup all that often, but we do appreciate that it’s bigger than the cups that come with other models. At 1,250 milliliters (or 42 ounces) to the top fill line, it’s more than twice the size of the KitchenAid’s 20-ounce cup, and holds at least 8 more ounces than the Dualit’s cup (the second largest cup of this year’s testers). It was the only one in this past round of testing that comfortably fit the ingredients for two smoothies. The Breville’s mini chopper also fits directly into the cup for tidy storage.

We prefer the ample size and handle of the Breville cup, far left, to the smaller and less ergonomic cups from Dualit, Panasonic, and Cuisinart. Christine Cyr Clisset

We prefer the ample size and handle of the Breville cup, far left, to the smaller and less ergonomic cups from Dualit, Panasonic, and Cuisinart. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

The Breville’s low and high speeds were more extreme than the other models we tested, and it’s noticeably higher high may be why it blends more efficiently. Although we found the 15 speeds mostly overkill, we did find the range helpful for particularly tough tasks, such as blending peanuts and ice, when you might need to start slow and gradually increase the speed. A small dial at the top of the blender controls the speeds, and it’s easy to adjust as you blend.

While not a necessity, the Breville comes with a selection of high-quality attachments, including a mini chopper, whisk attachment, and a guard for the blade. We’ve appreciated that guard over the past few years, as it makes it easy to stow the blender in a utensil drawer without risking slicing a hand.

Consumer Reports also likes the Breville Control Grip. Its editors chose it as their top pick with a score of a 92 out of 100 points. The Breville has an average warranty, only a year limited (we hoped it would be more, considering that the motor on the company’s food processor has a 25-year warranty).

Flaws but not dealbreakers

If you’re not careful, the Breville will totally pulverize an onion in its chopper attachment. The Panasonic and Dualit, which both also come with choppers, did a much nicer job with an onion. We suggest pulsing judiciously and checking the consistency of items in the chopper attachment often to keep from over processing.

We found that the Breville tended to decimate onions (bottom right), compared with the nicer and more even chop from the Dualit (bottom left) and Panasonic (top) attachments. Christine Cyr Clisset

We found that the Breville tended to decimate onions (bottom right), compared with the nicer and more even chop from the Dualit (bottom left) and Panasonic (top) attachments. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

We also don’t like that the blending wand has an opening at the top that can fill with water when washing. You have to be careful to dump out the water and air dry the wand upside down. Many of the other models with removable wands are totally enclosed, which we like better. Just be careful when washing and drying.

An opening lets water into the Breville’s blending wand; take care not to submerge when washing. Christine Cyr Clisset

An opening lets water into the Breville’s blending wand; take care not to submerge when washing. Photo by: Christine Cyr Clisset

Long-term test notes

Over the past two years of testing, we’ve used the Breville Control Grip and its attachments almost weekly to make smoothies, puree soups, and create fillings for recipes like ravioli. The model we have performs as well as it did when we got it. Some of the printing on the side of the handle has worn, but that hasn’t affected its performance.

The blender is a little tricky to clean under the blades, particularly when sticky things like peanut butter or thick soup (or mayo) get caught in the casing that surrounds the blades. But this is a problem with all immersion blenders. Sometimes it requires a little prodding with a utensil to get the gunk out (never, never do this while the blender is plugged in!). Running the immersion blender in a cup of soapy water also makes for easier cleanup.

Runner-up

Also Great
KitchenAid KHB2351CU 3-Speed Hand Blender
This doesn’t blend as smoothly as our main pick, but it’s comfortable to use and makes decent-if-chunky soups and smoothies.

We think the Breville is much easier to use and will make you a happier cook in the long run, but we recommend the The KitchenAid 3-Speed Hand Blender as a decent runner-up. It doesn’t blend as smoothly as the Breville, and it won’t really process tough ingredients, but it makes decently smooth purees, is comfortable to use, and performed second best in our tests in 2013.

Also in our tests, it created an excellent vortex. The only thing it couldn’t do that the Breville could was turn peanuts into peanut butter. It left quite a bit of pulp in the sieve when we strained the pureed soup, but not nearly as much as the far more expensive Bamix. We also found the button a little hard to push.

The KitchenAid’s rubber-coated handle is comfortable, although not quite as comfy as the contoured handle of the Breville. We found it much easier to grip than the Dualit’s slick plastic.

It was America’s Test Kitchen/Cook’s top pick in 2012. They found it “sailed through pesto, smoothies, soup, hummus, whipped cream, and mayonnaise,” and “it’s also tough and durable.” We did find a limited number of Amazon complaints about this model breaking, but no more than among the reviews for most immersion blenders. It comes with a limited one-year warranty.

Also great for occasional blending

Also Great

*At the time of publishing, the price was $30.

Cuisinart CSB-75BC Smart Stick Immersion Blender
Get this over our main pick only if you don't think you'll use it that often. It’s less powerful and feels cheaper overall, but it outperforms its $35 price.

At about a third of the price of the Breville, the Cuisinart Smart Stick CSB-75 is a surprisingly efficient blender if you don’t mind a slightly chunkier puree. To be clear, we’d still invest in the Breville for making daily smoothies or regularly pureeing soups or sauces. It might be three times as expensive, but it’s also three times the machine. But if you’re planning to use an immersion blender once a month or less, the Smart Stick makes a solid choice.

We were surprised by how well the Smart Stick performed given its low price. It blended soup on a par with the Cuisinart Smart Stick CSB-77, KitchenAid 3-Speed, and KitchenAid 5-Speed, which cost almost twice as much. And it makes a pretty good smoothie (although it can’t really tackle kale). This is the top-rated and top-selling hand blender on Amazon, and gets 89 percent four- and five-star reviews. Consumer Reports chose this as its third top-rated immersion blender, giving it 76 points out of 100. The Cuisinart’s three-year limited warranty also beats out the one-year warranty of both KitchenAids.

This model comes with only a mixing cup and no attachments, but the wand is removable and easy to clean.

The Smart Stick CSB-75 does feel cheap compared with the other models we tested, and we found that its plastic casing trapped food in the seams. Like many other immersion blenders, there are also multiple Amazon reviews about this model breaking.

Overall though, it’s adequate. If you’re only planning to use an immersion blender on rare occasions or you’re not quite ready to commit to a more expensive model, we think this is a great choice.

Care and maintenance

If you’re used to the multitude of safety features on food processors, you might find immersion blenders a little less, well, idiot-proof. In January 2013, the New York Times published an article (“Bandages Not Included”) about how easy it is to hurt yourself with an immersion blender. The author mangled two fingers on her immersion blender and quotes multiple others who’ve cut themselves. I even recently met someone who did the same at a holiday last year!

Always be mindful of where you’re pointing the blade end of the blender, don’t put your free hand in its path, and unplug it when it’s not in use.
Like the author says, it’s apt that these machines are often called “hand blenders.” Unlike food processors, the only thing protecting you from the whirring blade of an immersion blender is the cage that surrounds it. Always be mindful of where you’re pointing the blade end of the blender, don’t put your free hand in its path, and unplug it when it’s not in use.

Both experts I spoke with said the greater danger is actually splattering yourself with hot liquid. “The biggest thing is probably getting burnt,” culinary teacher Rudy Speckamp told me. To avoid this fate, soup pro Volker Frick says to always use the lower speed or pulse setting if working a smaller pot or saucepan.

Most of these machines should only ever be run for a maximum of one minute at a time, and then given a minute to three minutes before put to use again.
Immersion blenders tend to have short duty cycles. Most of these machines should only ever be run for a maximum of one minute at a time, and then given a minute to three minutes before put to use again. It’s important to follow these directions or you may overheat the motor and ultimately break it. We actually did this, by accident, with the Panasonic immersion blender we tested this year. After running it for about a minute and half, it died and we couldn’t get it to start back up. The only machines I found that don’t have a time limit on how long you can use them are KitchenAid 3-Speed and 5-Speed hand blenders.

According to its manual, the Breville Control Grip should be operated for only one minute at a time, with a one-minute cooling period. (When mixing super thick or heavy mixtures, the Breville manual says to operate the machine for only 15 seconds with one minute between each use.) The Cuisinart Smart Stick’s manual, on the other hand, says to operate it for 50 seconds at a time.

Although we’ve found the whisk attachment on the Breville useful for whipping eggs or cream, it’s not really suited for heavier tasks. If whipping something like a thick meringue, opt for a hand mixer instead.

Immersion blenders are generally easy to wash. Wipe the motor base with a damp cloth, and wash the wand with soap and water. Running the immersion blender in soapy warm water in the blending cup should loosen thick or sticky ingredients that lodge in the blade housing.

The competition

Despite its obnoxiously large, vibrating handle, the Dualit Immersion Blender ($130) performed as well or came in second in almost all the blending tests to the Breville. It actually has a nicer chopper attachment (the only chopper attachment we’ve seen with a feed tube). But we couldn’t get past the uncomfortable handle. We also found it tricky to twist the blending wand on and off the handle, particularly if it was slicked with oily ingredients. We found the Breville’s snap-on handle a much better design. Coming in at nearly $130, the Dualit is also expensive and we don’t think it’s worth the extra $30 over the Breville.

The KitchenAid 5-Speed Hand Blender ($100) wasn’t reviewed in any major editorials, but at the time of our 2013 testing it was the fifth-rated immersion blender on Amazon (getting 4.4 out of 5 stars and 85 percent positive reviews) and actually had higher user ratings than the KitchenAid 3-Speed. It comes with a big box of attachments, including interchangeable blades, a chopper, and a whisk. We didn’t find that the 5-Speed performed any better than the KitchenAid 3-Speed, and we didn’t think we’d use all of the attachments (the box would probably just gather dust in my kitchen).

Good Housekeeping chose the Cuisinart Smart Stick 2-Speed Hand Blender CSB-79 ($60) as one of its top picks, saying, “It offers excellent performance and it’s easy to use.” Food & Wine also recommended this model, saying, “The noticeably sharp blade purees beautifully, and the hood around the blade is extra-deep, which helps pull food through the blender.” In our 2013 testing, we found this model pureed on a par with the KitchenAid 3-Speed, KitchenAid 5-Speed, and the Cuisinart Smart Stick CSB-75, but was nowhere near as effective as the Breville Control Grip. It comes with whisk and chopper attachments, and has a three-year limited warranty. In testing, we didn’t find that this model did any better than the Cuisinart Smart Stick CBS-75, which you can pick up for nearly half the price.

We had high hopes for the the Bamix Mono ($150). Bamix is basically the Swiss Army Knife of immersion blenders (in fact, the two are owned by the same parent company), and this Swiss manufacturer still makes its blenders in Switzerland (the rest of the contenders are all made in China). I steered toward this company not because of editorial reviews, which are actually pretty sparse, but because of user reviews. On message boards on Chowhound and eGullet (from the Society of Culinary Arts and Letters), I gathered that Bamix immersion blenders are often considered the best around. Many reviewers say the motors are built like tanks and that the machines last 20 years. The blending wands of all the Bamix models are permanently attached (although most come with interchangeable blades). I chose the Bamix Mono because it’s one of Bamix’s least expensive models and it had great reviews on Amazon. In testing, we found that it has a comfortable handle and easy-to-push buttons, but sadly the blender didn’t create a great vortex and therefore was super slow in blending soup and smoothies. Surprisingly, it was the worst in our puree test, leaving a ton of fiber in the sieve. The quality of this machine seems very high, and it very well might last decades, but we found it agonizingly slow after the speed and efficiency of the Breville Control Grip.

As with Bamix, I was intrigued by Waring immersion blenders because they seem very durable. In fact, Waring makes only professional-grade immersion blenders. The company’s Quik Stik ($80) is the smallest model that Waring makes, and like the Bamix it has a fixed wand and no attachments. In its review, America’s Test Kitchen said, “This blender handled big chunks beautifully,” but that the “soup was grainy, and the smoothies and pesto were peppered with bits of unblended food.” I found that the Waring Quik Stik actually did a better job at pureeing than the Bamix or the Cuisinarts and KitchenAids we tested, and like the Bamix Mono, it feels very sturdy. But it doesn’t come with a blending cup and isn’t as convenient as the Breville Control Grip, with its removable shaft and attachments. If you were doing major quantity cooking and actually needed a pro-level tool at a moderate price, this would be one to consider, but most people would be better served by the power and speed of the Breville.

In our 2015 testing, we found that the Panasonic MX-SS1 Hand-Held Immersion Blender pureed decently, but was a bear on our wrists. It required a lot more maneuvering around the pot than the Breville or even the Cuisinart Smart Stick, which put a lot more strain on my wrists than any of the other blenders. The blending cup doesn’t come with a handle and was rather small, but the food chopper attachment worked nicely dicing onions. Unfortunately, the Panasonic died on us midway through testing, perhaps because we ran it past the duty cycle of one minute. To be fair, you should run most immersion blenders for only a maximum of one minute, and we ran the Panasonic for at least two on several occasions. Still, we did the same with all the other blenders and none of them died.

We found that many professional cooks (including The Sweethome’s Lesley Stockton) have long preferred immersion blenders made by Braun. But the company stopped making kitchen appliances for the US market.

What else did we look at?

Miallegro Professional MiTutto 9090: Although this was Consumer Reports’s best buy, it didn’t receive ratings as high as the other models we chose to test.

All-Clad Immersion Blender: This didn’t get ratings as high as the other models we tested in the $100 to $140 price range.

Bamix Professional: Consumer Reports rated this poorly, giving it only 51 of 100 points.

DeLonghi Hand Blender DHB723 Immersion Blender: Fewer than four stars on Amazon.

L’Equip 306700 Stick Blender: Fewer than four stars on Amazon.

Kalorik Sunny Morning Stick Mixer: Cook’s Illustrated rated this as its top pick in 2010, but downgraded it to the bottom of its list after many readers wrote to say it didn’t hold up well.

Oster 3-in-1 Hand Blender: Only three stars on Amazon.

Hamilton Beach 2-Speed Hand Blender: Few reviews and fewer than four stars on Amazon.

Hamilton Beach Turbo Twister 2-Speed Hand Blender: Amazon complaints about plastic cage around the blade melting.

KitchenAid 2-Speed KHB100ER: Serious Eats and Good Housekeeping liked this model, but it’s since been discontinued.

KitchenAid Pro Line Cordless Immersion Blender: Too expensive and not enough reviews to compare it with other models we decided to test.

Calphalon Electrics 3-in-1 Immersion Hand Blender: Although a top user-rated model on Amazon, it’s rather expensive and we didn’t think it would compete with the other models we tried.

Proctor-Silex 59738 Hand Blender: Its blending wand is made of plastic and the model did not seem sturdy enough to seriously consider.

Breville Cordless Hand Blender: Poorly rated by America’s Test Kitchen and only 2.2 stars on Amazon.

Nesco Professional Grip ‘n’ Go Immersion Blender: Also poorly reviewed by America’s Test Kitchen and only three stars on Amazon.

Cuisinart Quik Prep Hand Blender: This has a plastic cage surrounding the blade and only three stars on Amazon.

KitchenAid KHBC212ER Commercial Series NSF Certified Immersion Blender: Costing more than $200, we found this model prohibitively expensive. At the time of our research, it had also received only one user review.

Dualit 700 W Hand Blender: This model looks promising, but doesn’t appear to be readily available stateside. We opted, instead, to test Dualit’s 400 W version for our 2015 update.

Panasonic Hand-Held Immersion Blender MX-GS1: We thought this model looked like an interesting, cheaper version of the Panasonic MSS-1 we tested this year, but the company told us they’re phasing out this model.

NutriChef Heavy Duty Food Processor and Immersion Blender: We couldn’t find any info on the immersion blender on the NutriChef site, and there is no warranty info on Amazon. The NutriChef site only shows cutlery and cookware.

We looked at and eliminated a number of models from brands that we’d never heard of and that had scant information about warranty or the companies in general. Most of them also looked too cheap to be any good, including: GForce GF-P1429-925 Strong 3-in-1 2-Speed Hand Mixer and Blender Set 450 Watts; Homeleader®2 speed Stainless blades Hand Blender set With Attachments; Betty Crocker BC-1303CK Hand Blender with Beaker; Vremi Strawberry Cream 400 Watt Slim Hand Blender with Bottle; Simply Ample SA1412 Hand Blender 2-Speed 300-watt Hand Blender; Ovente HS58S 300-Watt Multi-Purpose Hand Blender Set.

What to look forward to

Cuisinart has recently updated its line of immersion blenders with a new model, the CSB-100. While too expensive to compete with our current choice for occasional blending, the CSB-100 does boast 700 watts of power, which is 300 more watts than our top pick. Watts aren’t everything however, which is why we’re interested to see what other reviewers have to say and what our own testing will reveal about this new addition to Cuisinart’s lineup.

Seriouseats.com recently published a three month review of immersion blenders, selecting models from All CladOXO, and Vremi as their top picks. For those focused on power they selected the All Clad, writing “The All-Clad Immersion Blender was an elegant brute of a workhouse, swatting away tomato soup, frozen-fruit smoothies, and white-bean purée like they were annoying flies.” Serious Eats also enjoyed the thoughtful design of the OXO blender with its included bright light, but noted that it wasn’t dishwasher safe. And The Vremi was selected for its wide array of useful attachments, “If you don’t have a good food processor—or ample room to have it out on the counter,” wrote Serious Eats, “the Vremi might be just what you’re looking for.”

To send this guide via email, fill out the fields below:
Message Sent!
Oops! Please try again
Send

Sources

  1. Rudy Speckamp, Interview, Instructor at the Culinary Institute of America
  2. Volker Frick, Interview, Executive Chef at Kettle Cuisine
  3. Immersion Blenders, Cook's Illustrated, April 1, 2010
  4. Clutter-Cutting Blenders, Consumer Reports, September 2011

Originally published: October 7, 2015

We actively moderate the comments section to make it relevant and helpful for our readers, and to stay up to date with our latest picks. You can read our moderation policy FAQ here.