Best Baby Monitor Is the Angelcare Baby Sound
My wife and I have a 4-month-old son, so we needed a baby monitor. After 20 hours of research and experimentation with several of the top models, the one I chose is the Angelcare Baby Sound Monitor.
Before getting into specifics, it’s worth talking about monitors in general, because as far as I’m concerned, what you choose is a very revealing glimpse into parenting philosophy. You want to make sure you understand all the options to pick the one that best suits your approach as a parent.
The range of available bells and whistles are a bit staggering, everything from automated lullabies to night lights to temperature readings to full HD video quality. These features can actually detract from the intended use of the technology.
These monitors allow you to keep track of your baby when you’re not in the same room, so you can actually still preserve a sense of your own life now that you’re a parent. They’re supposed to let you know if your baby is upset, even if he’s sleeping in his crib, and you’re 100 feet away in the middle of a noisy dinner party with friends. Everything else the monitor does is extraneous. Potentially great, but extraneous nonetheless. Some of the additional features are worth it; some are not. After a lot of time testing different monitors, I’ve decided on the features I think are worth it. I hope this review will give you a clear idea of what you want, too.
There are three types of baby monitors on the market:
- Audio-only monitors. This is how baby-monitor technology began: just listening to your baby. The traditional ones had a lot of static due to the analog connection between the devices, but new DECT technology generally allows for a very clear audio connection.
- Video and sound monitors. These big boys allow you to not only listen to your baby, but to watch him. They come with a camera, which you put in place, and then a receiving device that you can carry around with you.
- Monitors that use smartphone apps. These are the newest players to the market, and have a lot of promise. They feature a mounted camera, which then streams on an app for your smartphone. Most of these are iPhone (and iPad) only, but a few are available on Android. They are similar to the video baby monitors, except that they eliminate the additional gadget that you have to carry around to watch and listen.
Nevertheless, audio is all you really need to make sure that your baby is safe.
My answer is no. Each night I’d test these monitors out while my wife and I ate dinner. I’d set up the receiving device in our son’s room, and then bring the parent device to the dinner table, and we’d eat and try and be adults together, man and wife. I found that if I had a video monitor, I couldn’t help but to look at it. Compulsively. We’d prop it up on the table and stare at it and drift away from conversation. Was that a rustle of an arm? What could that possibly mean? Of course, it meant nothing. He was just moving, while we were unnecessarily distracting ourselves from enjoying a meal together because we were too busy checking out the HD video feed.
With the audio monitors, we could put the parent device on the table and actually be present with only each other, which is something you come to treasure as new parents. Our son wasn’t any less safe, and we weren’t any less aware of him, when he was on an audio monitor. But we were less anxious. And since audio devices cost anywhere from $100 to $200 less than video monitors, we had extra money to lavish on our son. Should we join a pool for swimming classes, or sign him up for baby music lessons?
In addition to researching monitors, I’ve spent a lot of time looking for counter arguments that disprove my conclusions. I figured that since video monitors are pretty popular, there has to be some compelling reason to get them. My search has come up empty. Even some of the best baby websites, like babycenter.com, don’t proclaim the video baby monitor better than an audio-only device. In fact, the only conclusive statement I could find on babycenter.com is that “it’s not necessary to use a baby monitor, but many parents find it reassuring.” So the gadget itself isn’t essential, merely helpful.
I realize the limitations of my own experience: I have a 4-month old, who cannot crawl, walk or climb his way into trouble. He can’t talk yet, either. So I spoke with the parents of kids from various age groups, to learn about their experiences with baby monitors. Some swear by their video monitors, and couldn’t imagine living without them. Others had video, and it drove them crazy, so they went to audio. Still others don’t use any baby monitor at all. My sample size was small, sure, but the reaction was definitely mixed.
That further convinces me that while there may be benefits to having a video monitor, they don’t outweigh the cost of the device or the potential to make you more obsessive about watching your kid. I can see how the monitor could be used during the day while your child has play time in his or her own room, but I also am wary of the slippery slope that the use of a video monitor represents. If you’re going to watch your kid play while he’s 3, or 5, or 7, when will you stop? Will you install cameras throughout the house? When will your child have time alone?
You might not be convinced, and you might absolutely want a video monitor. That’s fine. I have recommendations for those, too. But if you want to step away from your helicopter parenting for just a moment, and let the baby monitor do its job, then you should go with audio only.
Best Audio Only Monitors
Like I said, the best option is the Angelcare Baby Sound Monitor. It’s the one that I use every night.
Angelcare comes with different models, but I think you’re more than covered with the basic AC420. The sound is crystal clear. It has eight channels, so you can choose which channel gives you the least interference from any nearby wireless network or digital, landline home phones.
Without a doubt, one of the best features of the baby device is the customization of noise sensitivity. You do not want your monitor constantly streaming onto the parent handset. It would be incredibly annoying to be followed by the faint sound of static everywhere you go. With the Angelcare AC420, you set the sensitivity level (through trial and error) so that when you baby cries, it triggers the parent device to turn on and start transmitting. So you hear nothing when there’s nothing to hear, and then you hear your baby crying when he’s crying. This is particularly helpful if you play lullabies or white noise for your baby to sleep by. Set the sensitivity correctly and those sounds will not trigger the parent device; it will still only activate when your baby is crying.
The baby device, the one that goes in your baby’s room, is slick and has a little nightlight halo above it that actually makes it kind of look like an angel. At first I thought nightlights on baby monitors were ridiculous (just get a $2 nightlight!), but I’ve grown to really love them, and truth is, they are a pretty standard feature for any mid- to high-range monitor. The baby device is meant to be plugged into a wall, but also has space for back-up batteries so that in the event of a power loss, it can still transmit sound.
The parent device (it comes with one; you can buy a second) is equally slick and comes with chargeable batteries. Because of the voice activation feature, a full charge lasts a long time, much longer than the 24-hour period when I tested it without recharging. Also nice (but not necessary) is that the display shows the temperature in your baby’s room. We live in San Francisco, where people rarely use air conditioning or heat, so it’s kind of nice to know when the room is too hot or cold. This feature might be unnecessary for you, but I like it. Also, you can speak back to your baby through the parent device, but almost every baby monitor has this feature, and I find it kind of silly. Are you really going to soothe your baby back to sleep through a microphone? But either way it’s there, so make of it what you will.
Angelcare has an additional feature that you can get (for an extra cost) that detects motion. Basically, it’s a weight-sensitive pad that you put under your baby’s mattress. Excessive movement — or lack of movement, you program it — will alert the parent device. I think that this depends on how your baby sleeps. Ours moves around a ton in his sleep, especially when he’s groggy and trying to put himself back out, so I don’t think this would be particularly useful. But I can see how for some folks, this might be a helpful add-on.
Best of all, the Angelcare AC420 costs $49. That is pretty damn good for the peace of mind you get with a baby monitor, especially when compared to other devices. The only drawback is that the display on the parent device can be hard to see if you’re not looking at it from the right angle. This is a pretty noticeable design flaw, but it’s definitely no dealbreaker.
There are, of course, plenty of other options. I like the Phillips Avent Baby Monitor as well, but it’s much pricier ($90). The sound is extremely clear. As one Amazon.com reviewer, who apparently works in the electronics industry and so knows a lot about digital reception, wrote, “It has a crystal-clear signal and zero annoying interference.” The biggest perk you get for the price increase is more channels — 100 to choose from! For many, this is totally over-the-top and not worth the price increase, but if you live in a big apartment building with a lot of neighbors and WiFi routers and home phone lines nearby, then this might be worth it.
There are cheaper monitors, like the VTech Communications ($30) which is pretty good, but doesn’t come with the voice-activated feature that makes Angelcare such a winning device. You can turn the parent receiver off with the VTech and only get visual alerts through lights, but that’s not going to help much while you’re asleep. But any cheaper device, and you’re getting analog receivers, which means constant noise interference.
Best Video Monitor (if you must)
Again, I really don’t think you need a video baby monitor. I think you’re paying more money to be more worried about your sleeping baby.
*At the time of publishing, the price was $226.
The Motorola MBP36 is kind of the king of video baby monitors. It’s the top pick on Consumer Reports, and gets glowing reviews on Amazon.com. The baby device is a stationary, plug-in camera which you can pan and zoom using the parent device. Pretty nifty. The camera sends a live-streaming, full-color video to the parent device, and when the light is too low it switches over to night vision.
The thing that makes the Motorola MBP36 stand out is the video quality. It is widely considered to have the best video quality on the market. Even a one-star review on Amazon that otherwise hated the device acknowledged the video quality, commenting that “the quality of the video blew those non-tech co-monitors (Levana, Summers Infant, Mobi) out of the water.” I demo’ed the MBP36, and sure, it’s pretty good video quality, but it’s also pretty pixelated. It’s worth keeping in context that you’re not looking at a Pixar movie on an iPad, but a live streaming video.
Another attraction is the amount of things that you can do with it. You can play lullabies, turn a nightlight on and off, pan and zoom, change the sound sensitivity, all from the parent device. Now, granted, I consier many of these features completely unnecessary. The panning and zooming is cool but you can also just set the camera in the right place, and solve that issue. As for the lullabies…it seems like almost all the highest-end devices have lullabies, and to me, the inclusion sums up what is wrong with baby monitors. It’s too much, and that extra little add-on is not worth the hundreds of additional dollars when you could pay $50 for an Angelcare and be just as informed.
If you’re OK with getting a lower quality video stream, and not as many whistles and bells, then go with the Infant Optics DXR-5, which for less than $100 is a great deal for a video monitor. The cost is the best feature: It’s almost $100 less than any other video monitor, and reviews say that the quality really isn’t that bad.
Smartphone Monitors – not worth it yet
I went into this research very excited about the smartphone option. I thought there was huge potential for me to put our son to sleep and be watched by a camera which would send the video and audio stream to my iPhone. Since I carry my phone with me everywhere, it seemed genius. And if the app was closed, then I’d get push notifications any time the baby was crying. Brilliant!
The theoretical success has made these devices very popular with technology websites. While more traditional audio monitors are rarely reviewed, iPhone and Android-based monitors can be found all over the place.
Problem is, and none of these reviews will pony up and admit this, the smartphone apps are not quite ready to be the best on the market. They come with some really incredible features, like high-quality video streams, push notifications for sound and motion alerts, and the ability to pan the camera by just swiping your screen (how cool is that!), but they all run over WiFi, and WiFi can be slow. I found that even the best, most expensive monitor in this field had a delay of at least two seconds. Matthew Panzarino reported on thenextweb.com that BabyPing had a delay of four to five seconds, and this is for a monitor that costs $250.
Simply put, that’s not acceptable. The delay undermines the essential function of a baby monitor, which is to immediately alert you if your baby is upset.
I’ve read suggested other uses for smartphone-based monitors, such as long-distance parenting. In other words, let’s say Dad is across the country on a business trip and he wants to see how Mom and Baby are doing. He can chime load up the app over his WiFi network and there is the live feed, Mom and Baby playing in the nursery, and the ability to chat back and forth. Sounds great, right?
It also sounds like Skype, Facetime, Google Video, iChat, etc etc etc. All of these are free services. Would you really pay $250 to skype?
The devices themselves are shnazzy and nice, and the best-of-class is the Whitings ($287). Panzarino reviewed Whitings for thenextweb.com, and called it, “the feature-packed gorilla of this bunch.” Mat Honan reviewed the monitor for Gizmodo, and he, too, praised its versatility and functionality, “It covers every conceivable base in terms of detection (night vision, temperature, humidity, audio and video), works with your iOS devices, allows two-way communications, lets you set smart alerts, and can be monitored remotely. Setup is beyond easy, and the device is even aesthetically pleasing to boot — unlike your ugly, ugly baby.”
And yet both writers question if it’s worth the price tag. You know my answer.
Some parents have experimented with more simple cameras, like the popular Dropcam, which was originally created as a security camera for small businesses. Dropcam does not come with the pan and tilt, but it does have the push notifications and “HD” video stream that other devices claim. (It’s not HD, not at all.) It’s also much cheaper, at only $150. Its delay isn’t terrible, but it’s still a few seconds, and I had major problems with the reliability of the push notifications when I tried it out.
Get a digital audio baby monitor. My favorite one is the Angelcare Sound Monitor. Save yourself a few hundred bucks and use that money to do fun things with your kid.
Originally published: October 1, 2012